Sadly, the academic economics profession remains reluctant to embrace this new computational approach (and stubbornly wedded to the traditional equilibrium picture). This seems decidedly peculiar given that every other branch of science from physics to molecular biology has embraced computational modeling as an invaluable tool for gaining insight into complex systems of many interacting parts, where the links between causes and effect can be tortuously convoluted.
Something of the attitude of economic traditionalists spilled out a number of years ago at a conference .... a prominent economist objected that the use of computational models amounted to “cheating” or “peeping behind the curtain,” and that respectable economics, by contrast, had to be pursued through the proof of infallible mathematical theorems. The whole NYT article is here.
Thanks to Alessandro N.
-------------------------------------------------
♦DiggIt! ♦Add to del.icio.us ♦Share on Facebook
4th Look at Local Housing Markets in November
4 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment